| 1700 1711
Testimony during the 1711 rebellion of
Sumas, Manso, Janos and Jocomes, Tomás de la Cruz, Tigua governor of
Ysleta, stated that the outbreak began on the day when he "had been out
cleaning acequias with all his people at the time" (Hendricks 1996:16).
This statement is evidence that by this early date (1711) the Tigua
governor was in charge of acequia maintenance, which was performed with
his people.
1713
1713, Oct. 15:King
Philip V decree that directed Viceroy of New Spain to protect civil
liberties of the Pueblo Indians with provision for "sufficient water,
lands and timber entrances and exits; for cultivation be given to the
settlements and towns (pueblos) of Indians which may be formed; and
common of one league, where they can pasture their cattle, without
their being mixed with those of the Spaniards" (Bowden 1971:137, fnt.
#4; cited: House Executive Documents, 34th Cong., 3rd Sess., Document
No. 1, 519-520).
"This plan for the establishment of the Pueblos became Law 8, Title 3,
Book 6, of the Recopilación. The amount of land to be given to pueblos
under this law is not clear, but it is generally interpreted to mean a
league in each direction. After Mexico gained its independence, it
adopted the Spanish Pueblo Plan" (Bowden 1971:137; fnt. 4).
1725
Tamarón remarked,
that in 1725, the Rio Grande in the El Paso area "diminished and
dried-up" (Adams 1954:37).
1726 Pedro
de Rivers (Research note: check this it must be Rivera), inspecting
northern frontier of New Spain, visited El Paso del Norte and described
the irrigated lands which produced wheat, corn, beans, and all kinds of
vegetables, as well as vineyards of superior quality:
"The
natural fertility of the land is improved by the number of irrigation
ditches which carry water from the said Rio del Norte, making the farms
independent of droughts" (DoBkins 1959:104; cited from C.E. Castañeda,
Our Catholic Heritage in Texas, 1519-1936, Vol. I, p. 276).
1740
Flood destroys
Ysleta Mission and Pueblo (see Houser Settlement Study). Ysleta Mission
and Pueblo were probably moved to a new site (Timmons 1983:113-117).
1751
It appears that the
Ysleta Grant was made by Governor Tomás Vélez Cachupín. In 1751 he made
Indian grants made in the El Paso area which recognized and protected
land and water rights. For example, the Manso Indians of the pueblo of
Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe were presented a grant by Governor Cachupín
who recognized a nominee "to govern the distribution of water and land"
(Hendricks 1993b: 23). A large ditch was to serve as a boundary. The
governor then declared: "The person knowledgeable about surveying, the
alcalde mayor of water, and I examined this presentation and request.
It was all good land under irrigation and found to be of sufficient
size for the fields of the Indians of the nations that form this pueblo
as well as those who may join them in the future" (Hendricks 1993a: 24).
Most important about this document is the statement concerning
protection of Indian lands: "They are prohibited from selling,
alienating, or loaning the land in any way to the citizens of the
pueblo or its jurisdictions or any other person" (Hendricks 1993a: 24).
This document was authorized on March 24, 1751.
1752
Earthquake of 1752. An account recorded
by the German naturalist, Alexander Von Humboldt (Von Humboldt,
Alexander, Political Essay on the Kingdom of New Spain, Vol. 2, page
165, recorded from eyewitnesses during a visit to Paso del Norte in
1803-04. “The inhabitants of the Paso del Norte have preserved the
recollection of a very extraordinary event, which took place in the
year 1852.” “The whole bed on the Rio Grande river became dry all of a
sudden for more than 30 leagues above and 20 leagues below El Paso. The
water of the river precipitated itself into a newly formed chasm, and
only made its reappearance near the Presidio of San Elizario.” “This
loss of the Rio del Norte remained for a considerable time; the fine
plains which surrounded El Paso and which are intersected with small
canals of irrigation, remained without water; the inhabitants dug wells
in the sand with which the bed of the river was filled.” “At length,
after a lapse of several weeks, the water resumed its ancient course or
flow note: This source must be in error because the San Elizario
presidio did not exist until 1789. Check the date of this source).
1754-55
All Spaniards and Indians were assessed
four reales for every hundred grapevines they had under cultivation to
support construction of a dam in the El Paso area (Meyer 1984:67, fnt.
85: Manuel Antonio San Juan to Governor Velez Cachupin, July 17, 1754;
Junta de los Vezinos e Indios de este Pueblo, Feb. 9, 1755, ALPC PE-51).
1754
"A poorly designed
diversion from a major water source, such as the Rio Grande, could
cause flooding not preordained by nature alone. The town and presidio
of El Paso del Norte were subjected to repeated flooding by
uncontrolled Rio Grande water in the irrigation network itself."
referenced: Decreto del Sr. Govnr. dn Thomas Veliz Gachupin, 1754,
ALPC, PE-51 (source: Meyer 1984:92, fnt. #75).
Re: no prejudice clause protects Indian water rights: "When water
grants were made to Spaniards in Indian areas, the no-prejudice clause
often singled the Indians out for protection. Thus, when Pedro Cano
asked for a water grant in the Tarahumara region of Chihuahua in 1672,
he specified that such a grant would not be in prejudice to the
Indians, who lived quite a few leagues a ways, nor to any other third
party who might have a better right. Similarly, when a water diversion
project was planned for El Paso, the petition argued that the project
would be implemented 'without prejudice to the Indians or any other
third party". (Meyer 1984:153, fnt. #37: Testimonio de
Diligencias...capitulo veintee, Año de 1754, ALPC PE-51).
Royal
Ordinance (1754) ordered officials in New Spain to simplify the process
and make it easier for the Indians to avail themselves of it [referring
to, composición, the mechanism to clear title for land and water]
(Meyer 1984:134: fnt #5, Real instrución de 15 de Octubre de 1754,
cited in Galván Rivera, Ordenanzas de tierras y aguas, pp. 28-35).
1760
Bishop Tamarón's,
Bishop of Durango, description of El Paso area includes an account of
the irrigation systems (DoBkins 1959:104):
"That
settlement [El Paso del Norte] suffers a great deal of trouble caused
by the river. Every year the freshet carries away the conduit they make
to drain off its water... The method of restoring the conduit ever year
is to make some large round baskets of rather thick rods. When the
freshets are over, they put them in the current, filling them with
stones, and they act as dams and force the water to seek the mouth of
the ditch" (Meyer 1984:42, Fnt.#60: Adams 9 ed).
Bishop
Tamarón's Visitation, pp.35-36. Bishop Tamarón's visit and report of
April 1760 described the extensive nature of irrigation at El Paso del
Norte in the vicinity of the Manso Mission. Tamarón stated that in the
El Paso region, half of the river is diverted by irrigation: “There is
a large irrigation ditch with which they bleed the Río del Norte. It is
large enough to receive half its waters. This ditch is subdivided into
others which run through broad plains, irrigating them. By this means
they maintain a large number of vineyards, from which they make generos
[a typed of wine] wines even better than those from Parras, and also
brandy, but not as much. They grow wheat, maize and other grains of the
region, as well as fruit trees, apples, pears, peaches, figs.” -- The
settlement suffers a great deal of trouble caused by the river. Every
year the freshet carries away the conduit they make to drain off the
waters. The flood season lasts three months, May, June, and July"
(Adams 1954:36).
Bishop
Tamarón reported on the river in the El Paso area: "That settlement
suffers a great deal of trouble caused by the river. Every year the
freshet carries away the conduit they make to drain off it waters. The
flood season lasts three months, May, June, and July. They told me
about this before I came, and I traveled with more speed, since I had
to cross it before it was in flood. Three or four days after my
arrival, I sent to see the river, a trip which requires an armed
escort. It was already rising. It is at its peak on May 3. It was
necessary for me to wait while supplies for the journey to the interior
of New Mexico were made ready" (Adams 1954:35-36).
Bishop
Tamarón described the annual repair or reconstruction of the irrigation
conduits or small dams to divert water from the river: "The method of
restoring the conduit every year is to make some large round baskets of
rather thick rods. When the freshets are over, they put them in the
current, filling them with stones, and they act as dams and force the
water to seek the mouth of the ditch. This is not necessary when the
river is in flood. Indeed, so much water flows that if the river is
somewhat higher than usual, they are alarmed, fearing that they may be
flooded and inundated with great damage" (Adams 1954:36).
Bishop
Tamarón was impressed with the irrigation system within Ysleta, Senecú,
San Lorenzo and Socorro area making the following comment about these
pueblos: "They are as fertile and luxuriant as El Paso, with irrigation
ditches which the river fills without need for a conduit" [unlike the
Manso Mission].
1765 "Town
of El Paso del Rio del norte and Town of San Lorenzo. Question as to
right to use timber, etc." 1765 (Twitchell 1914: Spanish Archives of
New Mexico: Page 189 Item 691, Vol. I).
1766
José de Urrutia Map of El Paso del Norte documents extensive irrigation
system in the El Paso District a lateral canal for the Indians called
La Acequia de los Indios (which probably served the Mansos Indians; the
location of canals for the Tigua and Piro of Ysleta, Socorro and Senecú
is not defined on this map but probably was not part of the irrigation
system for the Mansos as evidence in Tamarón's statement above that
Ysleta, Socorro and Senecú were served by a conduit as were the Manso
Indians) (Gerald 1966:38-40; Meyer 1984:58, 59, Fig. #3.1).
1773
"In the same district follows the mission of La Isleta, abundant in
everything, with its separate irrigation ditch and a large number of
laborious, civilized, and industrious Indians" (Hackett 1937:506-507).
1774
Flooding in the El Paso area heavily damaged irrigation systems at
Ysleta, Socorro, and Los Tiburcios and many fields were washed away
(Hendricks 1993a: 28). Ysleta Mission & Pueblo destroyed which
resulted in relocating to the present day site of the Ysleta Mission
(Houser Research reports).
1779
May 14, 1779 complaint by Indians of Ysleta, Socorro and the real of
San Lorenzo against José Horcasitas who was charged to oversee the
flood control works on the river (Hendricks March 31, 1992:166).
1786
An 1786 document, concerning building an acequia to capture run-off
from El Paso and Senecú that would also benefit of Ysleta, was approved
and signed by José María Duran [grandfather of the Tigua leader by the
same name in the 1860's & 1890's] and Domingo Espinosa (Hendricks,
March 31, 1992:167).
1789 Governor
Fernando de Chacon called for community labor to cut and haul timber
from the Sabinal (Organ Mts.) for the bridge at El Paso (New Mexico
Archives, letter of November 16, 1789).
1791
Reiteration of the Recopilación de la Leyes de Los Reynos de las
Indias, which protects Indian lands and their rivers and waters and can
in no case be sold or alienated (Recopilación Lib. IV, Title 12, Ley
17, II 44; from: Batcho & Kauffman 1989:appendix A, Spanish Period
Chronology, p. 3).
1793
The following reference concerns dam construction in the San Elizario
area (April 3, 1793): "Vidal de Lorca informs Uranga that the thirty
wagons to be used to transport wood from Junta de los Rios will be
there on the next day. The wood is needed for the dam, which must be
worked on before the flood to ensure water for irrigation" (Hendricks
March 31, 1992:175).
1797 Bernal,
Francisco Xavier. acting Teniente de Governador. El Paso del Norte,
June 20, 1797. To Comandante-General Pedro de Nava: Reporting
misfortunes and mistreatment of a party sent from El Paso to bring wood
to construct a bridge across the Rio Grande, owing to a delay in
delivering the wood, and to Alférez Abrego's mismanagement (Twitchell
1914:II: 382, item 1383).
1798
Chacón, Fernando de. Santa Fe. Nov. 18, 1798. To Teniente de
Gobernador, Miguel de Cañuelas, El Paso del Norte: Answering Aug. 18.
1798, reporting induction into office, July 20; on payment for timber
from Sabinal for the El Paso bridge; etc (Twitchell 1914:II: 393, item
1430a).
Nov.
6, 1798 and July 9 and Aug. 10 "on construction of the bridge at El
Paso, and the payment for timber from Sabinal promised by Bernal"
(Twitchell 1914:II: 391, item 1492).
February,
1798, decree issued by Pedro de Nava, in February 19, 1798, which
prescribed the role of the El Paso pueblos concerning acequia
construction: "Nava transmits decree of superior government's advisor
made in response to request for more water and land by the citizens of
San Elceario. Advisor states that in time of drought, the pueblos of
the jurisdiction of El Paso are obligated to perform annual work on the
Río Grande dam at El Paso should take turns using the water in its
tank, beginning with the nearest pueblo. For better distribution, each
pueblo can build acequias within its limits as it sees fit or outside
of them after with the agreement of other pueblos, either individually
or together, can build their own dams" (Hendricks, March 31, 1992:195).
In
September 1798, the citizens of San Elizario informed José María de la
Riva that the Pueblo of Ysleta is constructing an acequia to trap the
remnants of water from El Paso (Hendricks, March 31, 1992:194).
1798 Arrangements
to send a party to the Sierra de la Soledad to cut wood for repair of
the bridge over the Rio Grande (Twitchell 1914:III: 481, item 1893,
part 3.; Research note: check this statement with photocopies in
research file because there is no recorded date). Apparently, it is
dated 1798.
1799
Governor Chacon reports: "...each pueblo has one league of land
assigned though at some pueblos more is cultivated" (Batcho &
Kauffman 1989:appendix A, page 3).
|